Each parliamentary deputy or senator, is the manifestation of the will of the people, from which he was elected, therefore, expresses the sovereignty of the people, but the Constitution the release of a warrant of voters, because the legislators have to seek the good of the community. This does not mean I have to betray the trust and the needs of their constituents, but, following the parliamentary debates, the closer view, the maturing of a belief also shared by her constituents, make the choices most appropriate to reach a law that may be good for the entire national community, of this, however, must be accountable to its constituents.
Art. 67 of the Italian Constitution says:
"Every member of Parliament represents the Nation and carries out his duties without a binding mandate"
In this article, the constituents are assigned to each Member with the responsibility of overcoming the opposition political party and to reach a synthesis of the various opinions in the interest of the common good.
democracy is strengthened and enriched through dialogue and the support of most citizens and their representatives. While the experience of Italian political life, this article has often been disregarded, when it has established the need for party discipline, or the so-called democratic centralism, when he made a pact with his constituents.
doing so was strangled at birth any form of dialogue between the various parties, and were fed the opposition in Parliament, making it difficult and poorly productive activity of stesso.E if MPs are appointed by the secretariats of the parties and included in the lists according to the will of the leaders, while voters can not express their preferences in respect of the same, could anyone imagine that the members of Parliament meet art. 67? And democracy as it would be fed?
0 comments:
Post a Comment