Friends Cant See Tagged Posts

In the beginning was the Word

1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God
2. It was in the beginning with God
3. Everything was done by her, and without him was not one of the things created was made.
4. In him was life, and life was the light of men.
5. And the light shines in the darkness but the darkness has not captivated.
6. There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. He
7. came as a witness, to testify to the light.
8. He was not the light, but came to bear witness to the light, so that all might believe through him.
9. Light, the true, that enlightens every man was in the world.
10. The Word was in the world and the world was created by him, but the world knew her not.
11. was in his own home and not received.
12. But how many received him, gave power to become children of God, the believers in his name, which
13. , not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man but by God they were born .
14. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, full of grace and truth, and we beheld his glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father.
15. John's has testified, and cried, dicenndo: "He was the one to whom I will say: 'He who comes after me has been put before me because he existed before me,"
16. fact is the abundance of Him, that we all received grace upon grace.
17. It was the law given by Moses, Jesus Christ, however, was made the grace and truth.
18. No one has ever seen God the Only God, who is in the bosom of the Father, he himself has made known there.
    GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST JOHN, Prologue. (1, 1-18)
    
    
    1. The word translates the Latin word "verbum" and the greek "logos", which are more pregnant with meaning, in fact, are to indicate the principle of the rational world, the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father.

Nipple Soreness After Taking Plan B

PARLIAMENT

often in policy debates are appealing to some ideological parties, especially those who disagree with the choices made by others. I wondered whether this name is both a negative and I wondered what it is ideology. I consulted the dictionary Palazzi, a reference to more independent. In that dictionary says that ideology is "the system of theoretical principles underlying a motion political or cultural. "
This definition does not see anything negative, or rather reflected a commitment to a group of individuals who seek a common understanding of the guidelines, principles which are shared with commisurare policy options to solve real problems. It will be a 'party of ideology, a way of seeing the reality of a social class, however, offer the country a project shared by many citizens.
Marx criticized the ideology as a structure of abstract principles that mask the reality of concrete facts, the ideology was for him a world view of the ruling class, surreptitiously justifying their political status. But Marx himself urged
the formation of class consciousness among the workers, the workers wanted them to realize the social value of their work for a company to claim their fairer and freer. He also proposed a conceptual design (ideological) to aggregate workers to change their state of life.
The liberal bourgeoisie of the eighteenth and nineteenth century had designed a world more free and more just for this project and have supported many revolutions to achieve it.
The labor movement of the nineteenth and twentieth century for a project of a more just and more free bore numerous fights, winning over social rights and political participation that is now recognized in many countries around the world.
addition to the liberals and socialists, other citizens, sharing common values \u200b\u200band world views, gave birth to the parties that support theoretical projects, political utopias that they believe can be done.
Today these parties are accused of ideology in the name of a policy based on practice, on doing. But what for? In favor of whom? To reach that goal? To support such shared values?
The story of the last two centuries has taught us that the imagination, dreams, the best design has advanced the claim of human rights and material well-being, not without obstacles and conflicts. These conflicts were stronger when and where it is showed a higher resistance to recognizing the rights of justice and freedom. Therefore there was a closure to the dialogue and exchange between the parties (sections of the people, social classes ...) and ideologies have been transformed into myths in dogmas unchangeable. But in the most democratic ideologies are compared, by improving their planning and the political and social conditions of the state.
The government of a country must reach a mediation of the real needs and ideals of its citizens must rely on intuition or theoretical one or a few individuals?
Although there is often a temptation to delegate to others the responsibility to decide, there is the instinct needs of the flock that the shepherd of the flock or in need of the head, a people that wants to be free can not renounce political participation, to dream and design within the company to which it belongs, especially with no warranty and may not entrust the limits the government of his country to one or more individuals who still have interests and individual projects.
Parliament in democratic countries is where the ideological and programmatic parties are confronted with the awareness that the ideologies of parties are biased, are not absolute.
in Parliament that must be exercised critical thinking, which is a comparison of ideologies and interests, to come up with solutions to problems which the daily history every day produces, and that these solutions will be decided on the widest possible sharing.